Case Stud­ies

The Prob­lem

A client need­ed exten­sive and com­pre­hen­sive Due Dili­gence inves­ti­ga­tion and assess­ment of a can­di­date pri­or to appoint­ment in a sig­nif­i­cant exec­u­tive role.

The Approach

Due Dili­gence tech­niques and process­es were dis­cussed with the client, and the client’s con­cerns, objec­tives and par­tic­u­lar areas of focus were explored. It was agreed that the Due Dili­gence assess­ment should be con­duct­ed extreme­ly wide­ly and com­pre­hen­sive­ly to inves­ti­gate all avenues ful­ly and ensure no areas of con­cern existed.

The Out­come

A com­pre­hen­sive Due Dili­gence report was pro­duced and the client was briefed thor­ough­ly on it. The report includ­ed an assess­ment of the risk of hir­ing this indi­vid­ual, based on a num­ber of find­ings and wide-rang­ing insight. As a result, the client was able to con­fi­dent­ly make a ful­ly informed and up-to-date deci­sion in rela­tion to the appointment.